Close
Premium Podcast Help Return to DrLaura.com
Join Family Premium Login Family

Work at Home

"Wikis" and the Law
05/07/2010
Icon"Wikis" and the Law By Cliff Ennico www.creators.com "I'm widely considered an expert in a particular field, and am thinking of contributing an article to Wikipedia - the online encyclopedia - as a way of promoting my consulting practice. What are the legal ramifications of contributing to a 'Wiki,' and how do I protect myself against liability?" For those who don't know, a "Wiki" is a collaborative Website where anyone can contribute content, and edit other people's content. Probably the best known "Wiki" is www.wikipedia.org , an online encyclopedia with more than 2,500,000 entries in English. Here's how it works: you write an article (if one hasn't already been done) and post it on Wikipedia. By so doing, you agree to Wikipedia's "Free Documentation License", essentially waiving your rights under the copyright laws. If other people see your article and feel they have something to add, correct or contribute, they can "edit" your content, so that over time the article will become longer, more thorough, more fair and balanced, and more up to date than any article by a single author could possibly be. Likewise, if you feel someone has edited your content incorrectly, you can "re-edit" your content and send e-mails to other contributors explaining why you are doing what you're doing, and so forth. Posting an article on Wikipedia can be a terrific way to get exposure for your business. Wikipedia has done an amazingly good job of search engine optimization - search for any relevant topic on your favorite search engine, and a Wikipedia article is likely to be in the first 10 listings. But there's a catch: because "wikis" are democratic by nature, you don't have to establish your credentials as an expert to post an article on Wikipedia. Indeed, anyone can post content on a "wiki", whether they know anything about the subject matter or not. And there's the rub. To quote from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia": "Users should be aware that not all articles are of encyclopedic quality from the start, and may contain false or debatable information. Indeed, many articles start their lives as partisan, and after a long process of discussion, debate and argument, they gradually take on a neutral point of view reached through consensus. . . . However, eventually additional editors expand and contribute to articles and strive to achieve balance and comprehensive coverage." Wikipedia, and other "wikis", have adopted policies and procedures to guard against editors whose goal is to distort the truth - called "vandals". Most wikis have an online dispute resolution mechanism for conflicting editors, and will bar repeated "vandals" from editing content on the site. But what if it's too late? What if someone edits your article on Wikipedia and does something bad that upsets someone so much that they sue you? Some examples: someone edits your article and posts false and misleading information about another person - a celebrity, a politician, or just an average person - with the goal of ruining that person's reputation (see the Wikipedia article on "Defamation"); someone edits your article and posts embarrassing - but entirely true - information about someone that invades their privacy (see the Wikipedia article on "Privacy Laws in the United States"); someone edits your article by "cutting and pasting" someone else's content into your article ver batim (see the Wikipedia article on "Copyright Infringement"); you have enemies, and they deliberately change your content by inserting incorrect or damaging information that makes you look like a fool (see the Wikipedia article on "Personality Rights"). When contributing content to a Wiki, or editing someone else's content, the word "partnership" should pop up in your head. Wikis are by nature collaborative - each article has several or more authors and "editors" - and collaborators usually are viewed as "partners" when it comes to legal liability. That's not a good thing, because partners have "joint and several" liability for their acts and omissions - if one partner gets sued, all partners are liable, regardless of the person who actually was at fault (see the Wikipedia articles on "Partnership" and "Joint and Several Liability"). So if someone sues the authors of a Wiki article because of a false or misleading statement made by only one of the authors, all contributors to that article are subject to the lawsuit. Of course, the "innocent" authors of the article will have recourse against the "guilty" author. This is called "contribution and indemnification" - see the Wikipedia article on "Contribution Claim (Legal)". But if the bad author doesn't have much money, has filed for bankruptcy, has given Wikipedia false data about his or her identity, or is otherwise "judgment proof", then the innocent authors, including you, will be left holding the bag. When contributing content to a "wiki", do your homework well - make your article as comprehensive, fair and balanced as possible to keep the number of "editors" at a minimum, and check your "wiki" contribution at least once each week so that you can catch and correct any wayward "edits" before they get you into legal hot water. Cliff Ennico ( cennico@legalcareer.com ) is a syndicated columnist, author and host of the PBS television series 'Money Hunt'. This column is no substitute for legal, tax or financial advice, which can be furnished only by a qualified professional licensed in your state. To find out more about Cliff Ennico and other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit our Web page at www.creators.com . COPYRIGHT 2008 CLIFFORD R. ENNICO. DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC. Permission granted for use on DrLaura.com.
PERMALINK | EMAIL | PRINT | RSS  Subscribe
< Back to Work at Home Archives